Latest News:
House of Night Marathon - 7 complete!
Recent Posts
Showing posts with label Featured Discussion. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Featured Discussion. Show all posts

[Featured Discussion] - Before I Fall Casting

Featured Discussion is a random discussion, hosted here, that highlights different book topics, random ideas, and overall point of view of the young adult community...

Want to join in?
Feel free to make a post and post a link back to it here.

Featured Discussion:

     Deadline.com announced that Zoey Deutch has been cast as Samantha Kingston in the Before I Fall movie. Which, while not who I thought it would end up being, I can totally seeing her as the character. I'm happy and I am going to see this movie either way.

     If any of you don't know she played in Vampire Academy (Rose Hathaway) and Beautiful Creatures (Emily Asher). So I am good to see how she handles this role.

 
©Zoey Deutch/IMDb.com 2015


     From Deadline.com:

     Zoey Deutch has been tapped as the star of Awesomeness Films’ next feature film project Before I Fall, the adaptation of the 2010 YA novel by Lauren Oliver that originally was set up some time ago at Fox 2000. Now it’s at Awesomeness Films, the movie division of multichannel platform AwesomenessTV that has already seen digital success with this year’s output Smosh: The Movie and last year’s Expelled.

     Deutch’s recent credits include Warner Bros’ Beautiful Creatures and The Weinstein Company’s Vampire Academy, and next up is Richard Linklater’s Boyhood follow-upEveryone Wants Some. She also is the female lead in Dirty Grandpa opposite Robert De Niro and Zac Efron. She is repped by CAA and Gilbertson Entertainment.
     If you would like to read more about Zoey, the movie and production company information see the full article here.

[Featured Discussion] - Thank You

Featured Discussion is a random discussion, hosted here, that highlights different book topics, random ideas, and overall point of view of the young adult community...

Want to join in?
Feel free to make a post and post a link back to it here.

Featured Discussion:


     I am not sure what happened, I tuned into my blog and found that two days over a the month and noticed that two of them just blew my mind. For some reason I got a rather large influx of views for those two days. I am not sure how or why, but I wanted to take a moment to say Thank You. I couldn't blog or wouldn't want to, if there wasn't people who appreciated or think my point of view is worthwhile. I appreciate the bit of attention and the support I have gotten. Thank you again.



     Thank You
     I could sit and talk about why blogging is important and list my perspectives on it, but frankly we've all read it and I just wanted to take time to take a different stance. Instead of commenting on why blogging is important, I want to explain why views are important.


1. Information
     The information provided to myself or any other blogger, helps them identify which target areas of their blog people are driven to or away from. Which drives more posts that people will enjoy and thus drive further pageviews and more information to where the blogger can improve. Without the pageviews, there's no information.

2. Networking
     Networking with other bloggers helps provide further information into meme's or different weekly events. I myself have found a few, and while I haven't added to that list, I am still part of it. The community is great, and they all help one another and follow each other. Being part of the community and networking with a few of them helps make my blog better.

3. Friendships
     Friendships come from the blog and the community the more you network. I haven't exactly made a few friends, but I am always glad to talk and become friends. I am still new and still more or less hedging my way, but making friends is a key part of blogging. The pageviews are nice and all, I appreciate them, and wish I could talk to and become friends with them all. If you didn't, than I believe you are in it for the wrong reasons.

4. Interest/Topics
     This kind of stems from Networking primarily but focuses on a bit of everything. There are a lot of topics and books (in my case) that tend to make their way onto my blog. I find that because of the Networking and the people I tend to follow and value, their books/posts tend to aid and help my own. Not that I steal from them, I give them credit where due. I value their insight and their input, and to them I thank them, and I value the input and insight you all provide.

      I wanted to take the time to thank everyone, all the people who help and support me, those I turn to and talk to for advice and information on other books. I wouldn't have this blog and keep doing it if it wasn't for all of you. I have learned so much over the two years I've been blogging, and its all thanks to you all. I wouldn't be here or do what I do without all of you.

     When I started I was looking for topics and what I should be doing on a blog. I did primarily book reviews, I wanted to be something bigger and better. I looked around blog depositories to see what meme's or weekly events were going on and what others were doing. I have renamed a few of them to follow some of the more conventional naming and events. It was that bit of networking and looking through other people and trying to join in on all the fun.

     I now have a series of weekly events and further other discussions that I do, this has never really been about what I can do. I have always viewed this blog as trying to provide information and a fresh, different perspective on the books and topics surrounding the whole community. Frankly if people weren't interested in what I had to say, I wouldn't be here. So thank you again.

     This has been a significantly large post to say Thank you, but it's worth it. I am not sure what happened during those two days, but I hope whatever it was, comes again. I wish I had that daily intake every day, I am lucky to get above 60 a day, so when I see anything above 200 I am ecstatic. Thank you, and please come back again.

[Featured Discussion] - Reviewer Stalking and Kathleen Hale

Featured Discussion is a random discussion, hosted here, that highlights different book topics, random ideas, and overall point of view of the young adult community...

Want to join in?
Feel free to make a post and post a link back to it here.

Featured Discussion:

     So I am sure all of you have heard of this already, the bit where some Author is so angry at a poor book review (no matter what rank or rating, frankly it doesn't matter) that they seek the person out, a la Kathleen Hale style. I want to take my time to throw my hat in the ring and at least voice my opinion. First off I am sad to see what happened to Blythe, it shouldn't have happened and I have heard and read a lot of varying different sides to the story and I don't know which way to go, nor do I know the full details. I am looking for someone to inform me better, and actually just talk about the issue in general.



     Catfishing? Really?
     "Although, like anyone with a tendency for low-grade insanity, I occasionally grow nostalgic for the thing that makes me nuts."  --- Kathleen Hale (in her article)

     I wanted to start there, frankly I believe that both are in check for this. Like I said, I don't know the full details so take what I am about to say with some salt. I am basing my view on this with some overall view of various sources. I have read some of Kathleen Hale's article and some other sources (I will link to), and that's where I'm going.

     What I want to start with is Blythe, I want to round out some overall groundworks for this and what I'm assuming to be true or mostly true:
     1. Blythe is a pseudonym, and may not be an author.
     2. Blythe left a negative review of Hale's book.
     3. Blyth (maybe) left various other negative social interactions on Hale's twitter, facebook, etc. sites.

     Now Kathleen Hale's assumptions:
     1. Admits to finding Blythe's real name and address
     2. Wrote a public article on The Guardian about the incident.
     3. Made numerous attempts and successes talking to "Blythe."

     There are probably more, and I will add to this list as time goes on.

      First I want to address the assumption that Blythe left various negatives responses to Kathleen Hales activities on Facebook, Twitter, etc. I don't know how true this section is, and is the weakest assumption I have on the whole debate. If it is true, it addresses and explains a small (VERY SMALL) portion of Kathleen Hale's interaction. Because frankly it makes Blythe the first initiator and the first bully/stalker in the whole debacle. Now upon going back and rereading some of this, I don't think this holds much if any validity. I keep it as a possibility (I don't know if it's true or not) until someone can verify and prove it (without a shadow of a doubt).

     The rest on the other hand paints Blythe as a blogger that may be a bit more aggressive reviewer and frankly a down to earth person. Now I'm not supporting Blythe so lets get that out there, I don't know him and I haven't read or seen any of his reviews (not that I don't like or dislike him, just never met him). Does that mean she (be honest, Blythe is a female, its everywhere) expected to get a visit or all the calls from Hale? Absolutely Not! I have left some bad reviews in my time, does that mean I am going to get a call from James Patterson and he's going to try to discuss why the book was good to me? No, but I would enjoy that call and gladly accept it. However, him showing up at my doorstep would be a bit creepy, having not warned me or told me in advance.

     So Kathleen Hale, she admits a lot in her article. I have to say the quote from above describes her wonderfully. I want to say one thing and get it out in the open. If Blythe had stalked her online (my weakest assumption), I think it would be okay to say that her reaction and crossing that line is rather absurd, but on a lesser scale. She would be doing it for a purpose not simply because she got a simple negative review.

     However throw that assumption out the window, and the whole debacle hits the fan. Frankly either way there is a certain tact of professionalism that any author should hold, and she crossed that line. I mean she could've call the police or get a restraining order (something) once she knew the real name. There was no point for the background check, no need to go to Blythe's house, and what was she trying to accomplish by going? It makes zero sense and frankly yeah she needs some sort of punishment or something. I mean read her article it's just that deplorable and worth a laugh at her mentality. When you have a dream that a lot of other people wish and dream for, act and respect those who are looking up to you; do not do show this much disregard.

     I want to say one thing though, and probably the one biggest thing I'll probably get flamed for. The book/goodreads community is very passionate and has pretty much raved and lit her page up. She isn't well, and frankly needs help, that's a given. However reviewing the book a one or lower, simply for her action is deplorable and defeats the purpose of Goodreads or Leafmarks. I am going to read the book, not because I am supporting her, but because I am interested in the book; although those that did review it, haven't had much to say about it. However, I may not leave a rating and ignore the whole review process, because she really isn't worth the sort of time.

    What I am torn about though is my own views on the process. I look at Goodreads and Leafmarks as an avenue to express my opinions and reviews of books aside my own blog. However not doing a review kind of goes against that idea, even if I don't want to support the author. The solution may put a big bold type at the time, about the incident and how I don't condone her or her action (like Neil Gaiman said). I don't want to insult the process or the sites. If they want to remove her, that's their decision and I can't make that decision. I will honor it, and I will do my own thing from that point.

     Moral of the story: Authors should hold some professionalism and respect the privacy and opinions of every and all reviews (even if they are a bully or not), regardless of the reviews they leave you. They did buy your book afterall. Reviewers respect the authors as well, they did write the story that you read, and while some books are better than others, they did spend a lot of time and effort on the book. Bloggers and Reviewers as well, be careful what you do, lest you become the bully yourself. Ignoring the person can be just enough and keeps you out of the crosshairs. Giving false reviews doesn't help the system or the site you are on, in fact I think it harms the site more than it does the author (bias and illegitimate reviews). I am not asking you to change or do anything, do what you feel is right. This is just my view and opinion. 

[Featured Discussion] - Book Condition

Featured Discussion is a random discussion, hosted here, that highlights different book topics, random ideas, and overall point of view of the young adult community...

Want to join in?
Feel free to make a post and post a link back to it here.

Featured Discussion:

     So I have been trying out different avenues of buying books. Half-Price Books, BookOutlet, and even the marketplaces on Barnes & Noble and Amazon (be careful with those because they aren't as reliable as the main place of business). So what I was surprised to find out is they all have a different form of rating the quality of books. BookOutlet is a simple Bargain and Scratch & Dent method which is fine I guess, but it doesn't tell me a lot about the book. I was looking for something that I thought would be useful to know as a universal method:



     A Guide to Book Conditions
     I found these on AbeBooks, now they use them for rare books. I know that my audience really isn't realistically going to buys some 100+ year old book anytime soon. Not so say that it's not possible, but I think their use of conditions and other book descriptions. It's one of the better lists that I have seen.

As New: The book is in the same immaculate condition as when it was published. This could be the description for a book that has been lost in a warehouse for years, never shelved, thumbed or even opened yet may still be some years old.

Fine (F or FN): A Fine book approaches the condition of As New, but without being crisp. The book may have been opened and read, but there are no defects to the book, jacket or pages.

Very Good (VG): Describes a book that shows some small signs of wear - but no tears - on either binding or paper. Any defects should be noted by the seller.

Good (G): Describes the average used worn book that has all pages or leaves present. Any defects should be noted by the seller.

Fair: Worn book that has complete text pages (including those with maps or plates) but may lack endpapers, half-title, etc. (which must be noted). Binding, jacket (if any), etc., may also be worn. All defects should be noted.

Poor: Describes a book that is sufficiently worn. Any missing maps or plates should still be noted. This copy may be soiled, scuffed, stained or spotted and may have loose joints, hinges, pages, etc.

Binding Copy: describes a book in which the pages or leaves are perfect but the binding is very bad, loose, off, or nonexistent.

Reading Copy: A copy usually in poor to fair condition that includes all text presented in a legible fashion. The copy is fine to read but nothing more.

Others:

    Bowed - A condition of the covers or boards of a hard cover book. Bowed covers may turn inward toward the leaves or outward away from the leaves. The condition generally results from a rapid change in the level of moisture in the air and is caused by different rates of expansion or contraction of the paste-down and the outer material covering the board.

    Chipped - Used to describe where small pieces are missing from the edges of the boards or where fraying has occurred on a dust jacket or the edge of a paperback.

    Dampstained - A light stain on the cover or on the leaves of a book caused by moisture such as a piece of food or perspiration. Generally not as severe as waterstains.

    Darkening or Fading - When book covers are exposed to light, the color darkens or becomes more intense. See also tape shadow.

    Edgeworn - Wear along the edges of hardback book covers.

    Ex-library – the book was once owned by, and circulated in, a public library. This book could well be in any of the above general categories but more often than not has been well used. May have library stickers, stamps, or markings. Any former library book must be marked ex-library.

    Foxed / Foxing - Brown spotting of the paper caused by a chemical reaction, generally found in 19th century books, particularly in steel engravings of the period.

    Loose - The binding of a new book is very tight; that is, the book will not open easily and generally does not want to remain open to any given page. As the book is used, the binding becomes looser until a well-used book may lay flat and remain open to any page in the book.

    Made-up Copy - A copy of a book whose parts have been assembled from one or more defective copies.

    Price Clipped - The price has been clipped from the corner of the dust jacket.

    Re-backed - A book that has been repaired by replacing the spine and mending the hinges.

    Re-cased - A book that has been glued back into its covers after having been shaken loose.

    Re-jointed - Means the book has been repaired preserving the original covers, including the spine.

    Shaken - An adjective describing a book whose pages are beginning to come loose from the binding.

    Shelf Wear - The wear that occurs as a book is placed onto and removed from a shelf. It may be to the tail (bottom) edge of the covers as they rub against the shelf, to the dust jacket or exterior of the covers (when no dust jacket is present) as the book rubs against its neighbors, or to the head of the spine which some use to pull the book from the shelf.

    Sunned - Faded from exposure to light or direct sunlight.

    Tight - The binding of a new book is very tight; that is, the book will not open easily and generally does not want to remain open to any given page. As the book is used, the binding becomes looser until a well-used book may lay flat and remain open to any page in the book.

    Trimmed - An adjective indicating that the pages have been cut down to a size smaller than when originally issued.

    Unopened - The leaves of the book are still joined at the folds, not slit apart.

    Working copy - Even more damaged than a reading copy, the working copy will have multiple defects and may even need repair.

    Worming, Wormholes - Small holes resulting from bookworms (the larvae of various beetles.)

          I hate receiving a book that is not as described, and frankly my main choice in picking who I buy books from is the one who describes the book better. I find myself more often than not arguing with a seller on what the description of "Very Good" vs "Like New" more often than not you have to track down "whatever-site-your-on's own condition chart. If there was a general universal condition chart to go by, it would be helpful. Further if you ask for any further questions (Shaken, Made-Up Copy, etc.) I am met with confusion and chaos. Please, become familiar with some terminology while you're selling books.

         The biggest thing though is the lack of condition standardization. I am constantly checking charts on Barnes and Noble and Amazon trying to understand what the book I am thinking about buying will look like. Frankly the reason I would love to see some standards coming out would be the general lack of confusion there would be. I love getting a "Like New" book without the dust jacket. It pains me to complain to the seller and argue that there wasn't something clear with their description.

         The reason I chose this list was because of how firm and tight the difference between conditions are. I love how the "As New" book needs to be crisp and frankly perfect from the publisher. What blew my mind is that the "Fine" book is like the "As New," however, the condition isn't perfect but pretty close. Further I was blown away that the dust jacket is present and expected up until the "Fair" condition. In most cases its the Very Good or 3rd ranking that most sites will not mandate the dust jacket. In every case the jacket is major portion the value of the book, and what I weight my decisions on.

         Now I want you to go out and just take a look around. I guarantee you'll see what I mean with how the different condition listings differ (Amazon and Barnes and Noble). I hate the difference between the sites, it confuses me, and when I think I understand one site over another. Barnes and Noble's is just very vague and lets them get away with interpretation errors. The standardization would make sure all sites or a guide/common knowledge that all book sellers would use and make use of. It would be a great addition, to both sides of the book world.

         Let me know what you think, please leave a comment or send me an e-mail. I appreciate all feedback and discussion on these articles. Thanks in advance for the time and reading some of my views on the matter.

    [Featured Discussion] - Annoying Stickers

    Featured Discussion is a random discussion, hosted here, that highlights different book topics, random ideas, and overall point of view of the young adult community...

    Want to join in?
    Feel free to make a post and post a link back to it here.

    Featured Discussion:


         I hate these things! I know that some places like Half Price Bookstores need to do it for the whole pricing/barcodes. However what I hate most about them is the after effects of trying to peel the dumb things off. I know that some people leave them on so they don't have to deal with the sticky glue square that's left behind afterwards. I myself hate the look and feel of both, I have been trying to find other ways to get rid of the glue and whatnot. Frankly in my limited search there just isn't much. However my rage is still prevalent.



         Sticky Sticker Madness
         Well you just bought a new books from a local buy/sell used bookstore, we all have them. However when you do they have those funky stickers on the front cover, covering your favorite part of the graphic, or they are just there. You peel it off and the glue still adheres to the cover, or worse the sticker splits and you get tiny pieces of that sticker still stuck to the cover. It's madness and frankly I have hunted and searched for ways to get it off. I honestly don't know the best way to remedy this and I don't suggest using soap and water.

    What I do is:

    1. Take a utility blade, or knife (if you are careful) and slowly slide between the sticker and cover.
    2. Once a bit is up and loose, use your fingers to slowly pull the sticker away going back and forth.
    3. Occasionally you may have to repeat 1 on the other side because of a tear, be careful.
    4. If you happen to get stuck on glue or it tears too much, this is where I go blank on the best way. I have a bottle of Goo Gone and a spare rag. I apply the Goo Gone to the rag and wipe the area down and use the utility blade (best in this case) to pull any other debris up and off the cover. (WARNING: I am not sure if this is the best way to do so without damaging the cover. I know it's not the best chemical for books and whatnot, but it's the best at what I've found.)
    5. Afterwards I use a small damp cloth to wipe any Goo Gone off the cover and quickly use a dry towel to remove any wetness. (NOTE: Please do not use this on Paperbacks. Any liquid on the cover will warp and destroy the cover. I have found out and it made me sad.)
         Now I know that this probably isn't the best method and frankly if you have any suggestions for something better, please let me know. I want to find something better and while I keep trying there just isn't anything I'm willing at the moment to test on a book that I know won't damage the cover. I am open to suggestions, post them in the comments or e-mail me. Thanks!

          I want to take this a step further, is there ANY way at all that something couldn't be done with the barcode already on the book? I mean can't you use that and program the code in your system to whatever price you want to set it as. I know that some stores can't do that, Half-Price books, but on the other hand Meijer doesn't have an excuse I'm sorry. You have shelf labels too, I mean spend the money on shelf labels if you're doing it for book labels (it's probably cheaper too).

         I am just aggravated on all the stickers I have to take off on a monthly basis. Frankly It's somewhere around 10-20 books a month, and while that may not sound like a lot, but when you start doing it and trying to keep the book as perfect as it is, it's more or less annoying. Than I have to try to use Goo Gone, when I am worried that the book won't make it through the glue treatment. I have realized that the longer the book has stayed on a shelf, the worse the glue becomes. Frankly you can almost date the shelf-life of a book on that, it's sad.

         So I will go a step further and ask, what type of glue does Meijer or Walmart use that's so different from Half-Price books or is it the sticker in general. 90% of the time, Half-Price Book stickers come off without any hitch and they earn most of my business at the moment, however Meijer and Walmart I can't ever manage to get them off perfect. Something always arises, and I more than often get frustrated and want to beat whoever marred my beauty. Amazon is by far the worst, and I have no idea why. They have a sticker on the back barcode and sometimes on the front. The back I always have to use Goo Gone on, and I know it's not been on there too long. It's annoying, its painful to do, and just downright unnecessary. Stop doing it, or give me the option to buy the book without the stickers, I'll save you the money of having to not label the book.

    [Featured Discussion] - Wrong Book/Wrong Place

    Featured Discussion is a random discussion, hosted here, that highlights different book topics, random ideas, and overall point of view of the young adult community...

    Want to join in?
    Feel free to make a post and post a link back to it here.

    Featured Discussion:

         I thought about doing this, but at the same time this is a question I want to ask the book universe. Frankly I found the matter funny and while I was shopping at Meijers. When I was looking through their YA section I found this Mark of Athena by Rick Riordan book. However if you look at it, it clearly came from Sam's Club. My question is is this book even their to sell, or do they have the ability to sell books from another store? I mean if a special edition book from Barnes and Noble ends up on Walmart's shelves, does that give them the right? Now don't get the wrong idea by this topic, I bought the book, and didn't question it there, because frankly they will of course say they can sell it.



         Wrong Book/Wrong Place?
         So the meat and potatoes of this story is, is Meijer allowed to sell me a book that for a lack of better words came straight out of Sam's Club. The picture is there, I took the sticker off cause frankly I hate the damn sticky sons of ... Now my first question is is this technically considered stealing? I mean I bought the book, but what if someone left it there and they didn't know any different. Well the cashier commented on it, but went about her job as normal like nothing was happening.

    steal [steel]

    verb (used with object), stole, sto·len, steal·ing.

    1. to take (the property of another or others) without permission or right, especially secretly or by force: A pickpocket stole his watch.
    2. to appropriate (ideas, credit, words, etc.) without right or acknowledgment.
    3. to take, get, or win insidiously, surreptitiously, subtly, or by chance: He stole my girlfriend.
    4. to move, bring, convey, or put secretly or quietly; smuggle (usually followed by away, from, in, into, etc.): They stole the bicycle into the bedroom to surprise the child.
    5. Baseball. (of a base runner) to gain (a base) without the help of a walk or batted ball, as by running to it during the delivery of a pitch.


         I don't consider it stealing, I mean I didn't walk out with the book. I legitimately paid for the book. However I believe that something is amiss in this case. I mean I don't believe they should have been allowed to sell me the book in this case. If you think about in a reverse case, they just stole the sale from Sam's Club. Now don't get me wrong I am not trying to get either of them in trouble. I am curious to see what some others would have done.


          First of all, I could have bought the book at another case, so maybe I am to blame just as much (But it's Rick Riordan!). I found it rather funny buying a Sam's Club book at a Meijer. I should have scanned the receipt (minus all the personal information and such). I am curious if I did the right thing, should I have been able to buy the book or not?

         The options for this are simple:
    1. I shouldn't have been able to
    2. I should have been able to
    3. I should have but at a discount
    4. I should have brought it up, and questioned the cashier
          I am not sure what I should have done looking back on it. I mean buying the book as a consumer is beyond a doubt the right answer, but morally should I have stood up for Sam's Club and brought it to the attention of the Meijer's employee? I don't believe it's my responsibility for that, but what if it was it was the book of some child that was left behind? How would I have known, and no one questioned me about it, not even the cashier. Frankly I don't believe I am at all at fault, I don't think there was any way to know anything else other than try to buy the book at a foreign store. I just laughed.

          Feel free to comment and berate if you feel like it. I want to know what you think and ultimately to see if what I did was overall morally correct. I can't get past how hilarious it was.

    [Featured Discussion] - My Take on the New Adult Genre


    This is a new segment, Featured Discussion. Where, I am looking at heading with this segment is more of a opinion based discussion. There is some that will be true and fact, but for the main part I want a good discussion, and I want people to chime in and talk. I will make my opinion and comments known as well. However please, PLEASE do not insult or degrade anyone else.

    Featured Discussion:

         I wasn't sure what was going on with the new genre, and I wanted time to take a look at it. New Adult, and I thought it was an extension of the current Young Adult genre, but I was wrong. It's a new genre almost entire of it's own. At first, I thought it would be more sci-fi, mystery, and romance, and there is all of that and then some. Yet, what I didn't expect was that the books would take a more indirect adult tone that I thought would be there.



         What is New Adult?
         New Adult (NA) fiction is a developing genre of fiction with protagonists in the 18-25 age bracket. The term was first coined by St. Martin's Press in 2009 when they held a special call for "…fiction similar to YA that can be published and marketed as adult—a sort of an ‘older YA’ or ‘new adult’." New Adult fiction tends to focus on issues such as leaving home, developing sexuality, and negotiating education and career choices. The genre has gained popularity rapidly over the last few years, particularly through books by self-published bestselling authors like Jamie McGuire, Colleen Hoover, and Cora Carmack.

         The genre was originally met with some criticism, as some viewed it as a marketing scheme, while others claimed the readership was not there to publish the material. In contrast, others claimed that the term was necessary, with a publicist for HarperCollins saying that it "is a convenient label because it allows parents and bookstores and interested readers to know what is inside." It has now become widely accepted with most traditional publishers now publishing NA books and Goodreads, Amazon and Kobo adding it as an official category.

         Examples of books in the new-adult genre include Jamie McGuire's Beautiful Disaster, Colleen Hoover's Slammed, and Cora Carmack’s Losing It.

    Source: Wikipedia

          I own Beautiful Disaster and while I am more than likely going to be reading that for the next month's Reader's Choice, I didn't think it would fall into this new genre. I want to get into and read some of the new books, but I don't want to plow through and find a series of a hundred books to read and find out that four-fifths of the books aren't worth my time. I guess what I'm trying to say is I want to wait and see how the books in this emerging genre fair before I dive straight in.

          Okay my first point of issue with this genre as of right now aren't that the fans or readers aren't around to read or see this style of book, isn't that this is some marketing scheme to try to entice others into a book they may not read, but it's the style of book that makes me queasy. The books focus on self identification in the face of growing up and moving out of your parents house or a new independence, differing choices in careers or college choices/education, and furthermore sexuality. I was all in for the styles until the last one, and it's my fear of the emerging stars and what the adults nowadays are into. I  picture this book as a bunch of Lady Gaga fans porking it up.

          I want to know personally, what books are the better choices for those that are on the market. I am not interested in the steamy smut novels that young stay at home moms dream of, but I want a romance of honest integrity. I enjoy the troubled decisions that come from the heart, and love style of book that weaves the emotional stress and pain of moving out on your own, new independence, or just life in general would take on a new adult. I want to see the pride and joys of this genre.

          As well, I can't find any distinguishing difference between Young Adult and New Adult. Okay I understand it has more to do with being an adult, but the only real difference is it has a more sexual nature to it than the others. Similar topics can be discussed in both genres and I guess I am asking myself, what was the reason (other than distinguishing the age groups) for splitting the two apart? I personally don't see the need, by the synopsis in the book you can generally tell what age group, or frankly most online stores now have the age range right on the book's page.

          Now you may ask, why am I only interested in seeing the best of this genre, because right now I am not sure the risk beats the benefit of reading one of these books. Frankly I don't know and can't find a list of books in this genre easily, and when I do none of it interests me. I have been looking all over the place, and a few fellow bloggers I am following are reading a few book in this genre and I am curious to see what they have to say. I appreciate their hard work and what they are doing trying to weed out the bad novels in the genre. I applaud you all.

    [Featured Discussion] - Books and Music Inspiration


    This is a new segment, Featured Discussion. Where, I am looking at heading with this segment is more of a opinion based discussion. There is some that will be true and fact, but for the main part I want a good discussion, and I want people to chime in and talk. I will make my opinion and comments known as well. However please, PLEASE do not insult or degrade anyone else.

    Featured Discussion:

         I didn't expect Thursday to come up as quick as it did, and frankly I wasn't all that prepared for it this week. I had to hunt for a good topic and the featured article this week comes from Barnes and Noble again dealing with songs that were inspired by music. I wanted to highlight their opening comments and what they say about a song, but mainly I want to give my opinion afterwards. I hope you all enjoy this week, with how music helps shape ideas and furthermore gives us more than just words on a page.



         9 Songs That Were Inspired by Books
         If you can’t get David Bowie to join your book club, do the next best thing and pick a book he’d recommend—his taste for Orwell is not-so-well hidden inside songs like “Big Brother.” It’s alway fun to spot a literary easter egg, tucked away in the music of everyone from hipster godfather Lou Reed to perennial Romeo-seeker Taylor Swift. Here are some of my favorite book-inspired songs, brought to us by rock stars who play lit geek on the side.

    ...

    “Ramble On” (Led Zeppelin). As Robert Plant always says (probably), I like a little troll in my rock and roll. Not of the internet variety, but honest-to-God trolls. Yes, behind the leather pants, glorious hair, and rock-and-roll howl, Plant was a Tolkien geek. He doesn’t even try to hide it: “Twas in the darkest depths of Mordor, I met a girl so fair. But Gollum and the evil one crept up and slipped away with her.” Want to see The Hobbit with me, Bob? I’ve got Netflix.

    Source: Melissa Albert on Barnes and Noble

          I am the opposite sort of, I tend to write more when I am listening to music or have a good beat that's stuck in my head and pounds constantly asking to be let out. So I would assume it would be similar for musical artists to do something similar with books; find a good story and all the while you can think of music to company a good story and capture those emotions. Yet either way both produce spectacular works; now before I get jumped on for that I am not saying that not all music is good or all books are good.

          What I wanted to talk about was my experience as a limited writer and avid listener of music. I find myself mainly coming up with the best blog ideas when music is beating in the background and slowly thrumming through my body. It's no wonder that at the same time I associate certain emotions and events to songs and I use those songs to write specific moments in a book. It's not often that I find new songs that stimulate my mind, and when there is a song that does I tend to write like crazy.

          As well, when I am reading a book, I can associate certain songs that would go great with scenes. Its that association between what emotions and feelings music captures and the same with books that together complete certain scenes. It's hard to write those in books or capture those moments completely, frankly I don't think it's possible. I think some of the best books that capture the raw emotions and make you think more about the book than just the words and the evolving plot, but leave some of the best to the reader to interpret. A good author can guide a reader in the right direction, but doesn't need to hold their head and show them completely. Now I am not saying an author can leave out imagery or any context related details that would otherwise confuse the reader either.

          What I enjoy is reading a good book and finding that I have some wiggle room to find my own music and inspiration behind the vivid characters and plot. I want to feel the author want me to complete the scene and feel a part of the story. That's what every author's dream should be. I understand that I've actually gone off topic for a while and I should get back on topic.

          Music is a great way to help keep your mind fresh, but so are books. Together they help create an emotional paradise and both tell a story that will hopefully touch your heart. We all hold a few songs close to our heart, me included; but I wonder if there's a book we all feel that way about. I want to read more and want to listen to more music, but I don't have time for it all, or to understand every book or song. So I try to sift through the fields of both mediums and try to find what I am most interested in. Yea there's bad books and there are good books I read, but I don't regret any time spent on either of them.

    [Featured Discussion] - Putting A Bad Book Down

    This is a new segment, Featured Discussion. Where, I am looking at heading with this segment is more of a opinion based discussion. There is some that will be true and fact, but for the main part I want a good discussion, and I want people to chime in and talk. I will make my opinion and comments known as well. However please, PLEASE do not insult or degrade anyone else.

    Featured Discussion:

         At first I thought the book I was reading I could make it through it, and the more I pressed on the more I fell into denial. I pushed further, trying to convince myself that I could make it through the book. I thought just a few more pages and I would be gripped beyond any and all control and want to read more and more until I couldn't put the book down. I looked and scoured those pages trying to grab onto anyone or anything. I couldn't the book drug through me and seemed to drag me along its own dull boring plot. It would be the first book that I encountered that I wanted and will to put down.


         Stage 2: Anger
         “How can this #!@$&*! book be so #!@$&*! dull?” you ask yourself. You decide to Google the title in hopes of discovering some fascinating analysis of it that will suddenly make it riveting, compelling, a real page-turner. But instead you learn a tidbit such as the following: David Copperfield isn’t the title Dickens gave to his novel. No, he planned to call it, The Personal History, Adventures, Experience and Observation of David Copperfield the Younger of Blunderstone Rookery (Which He Never Meant to Publish on Any Account). And that’s when you start yelling about being misled and how obviously you never would have attempted to read something with that title. Soon you’re directing your anger at characters in the novel and muttering things like, “Ham Peggoty—what the $#@ kind of name is that?” and trying to rip out the pages of the book, which proves to be a little challenging, as you are reading it on your NOOK.

    Source: Jull Boyd on Barnes and Noble

          We all have moments or a book we have that just needs to be put down, we want it so bad but for some reason we will ourselves to keep searching for that one reason to keep going. Mine was The Casual Vacancy by J.K. Rowling. I couldn't get passed the dull characters and throughout half the book, the plot never moved. I rifled through the pages looking for reasons to keep reading, and the more I looked the less I found. It was as if the book crumbled around me. I knew it was, and I watched it fall around me; yet I couldn't stop myself I wanted to find that one reason.

          Barnes and Noble put a blog post about the Five Stages Of Breaking Up With A Book, I encourage you to go read it and make your own judgement. I want to talk about why you should put that book down and  move on. First off I understand that there are books out there that speak to us and call to us, and those books linger on our mind far more than those who need to be let go.

          I don't think that just because you don't get into a book, think you should immediately leave the book for something better. First give the book a chance, personally I give a book two to three chapters and if I'm not slightly interested than I decide to put the book down and ask myself why. If I can answer why the book is bad or why I'm not interested it gives me a little way to look for what I am seeking in the book. However, given that you may or may not understand why the book doesn't have your interest, give the book a few more chapters one to two again to see if your concerns are addressed. Basically if in four to five chapters if I'm not at all interested or evenly partially interested, I know it's time to abandon a book.

          So now that I have at least passed on when I feel a book should be put aside, afterwards as a blogger I make sure to make notes on why I disliked or left the book. The reason for this is I may not review the book right away and I want to remember the way the book made me feel and the reason I abandoned the book. Even if you aren't a blogger, it would help keep the idea and the experience fresh so if any of your friends ask about the book you know what your answer might be.

          Even if a book is disliked and abandoned it's left an impression on us. So what if the book left a foul taste in your mouth, the impression and the experience is still there. I personally remember The Casual Vacancy very well. As well, later on down the road, give that book a second chance as well; personally my mood changes from time to time and with it my taste in books. Granted when I review a book I wait until a few days after I finish the book to write the review, because it leaves my emotion out of it and I give the review a good impartial opinion as I can do. I urge you to do the same, it may allow you to find a book you never thought you would enjoy and rightfully didn't the first time.

    [Featured Discussion] - Covers That Make You Squirm

    This is a new segment, Featured Discussion. Where, I am looking at heading with this segment is more of a opinion based discussion. There is some that will be true and fact, but for the main part I want a good discussion, and I want people to chime in and talk. I will make my opinion and comments known as well. However please, PLEASE do not insult or degrade anyone else.

    Featured Discussion:

         I was looking at the bloggers I following and seeing what they commented on and what was grabbing their attention. Than a book caught my eye on Me My Shelf and I, I thought the book was familiar. I remember it from someplace, but the book never really caught my eye before. I was looking at this book and the post trying to understand what was wrong with the book. Well it's best to let Me My Shelf and I (Here) and I explain this, as well as the Huffington Post.





         Flowers in the Attic Synopsis
         Such wonderful children. Such a beautiful mother. Such a lovely house. Such endless terror!
    It wasn't that she didn't love her children. She did. But there was a fortune at stake--a fortune that would assure their later happiness if she could keep the children a secret from her dying father.

         So she and her mother hid her darlings away in an unused attic.

         Just for a little while.

         But the brutal days swelled into agonizing years. Now Cathy, Chris, and the twins wait in their cramped and helpless world, stirred by adult dreams, adult desires, served a meager sustenance by an angry, superstitious grandmother who knows that the Devil works in dark and devious ways. Sometimes he sends children to do his work--children who--one by one--must be destroyed....

         'Way upstairs there are
         four secrets hidden.
         Blond, beautiful, innocent
         struggling to stay alive...

          That was the synopsis, and I want to give credit to both places (Me My Shelf and I and Huffington Post) and I don't want to receive any credit for this, just the opinion I am going to voice here in a few sentences. I want to thank both sites for this funny and oddly gross. The two on the front cover is supposed to be a set of siblings, brother and sister. When I first looked at the book I was a bit shocked and taken back. You know what they say about books whose illustrator appears to know nearly nothing about the book, except what the synopsis is.

          When I look at this, my mind travels to other books. There are those books that I see that have the same cover, and I am left wondering why the second book kept the cover when the first book came out. I am often puzzled by why covers are the way they are, and part of me wonders how the process happens. How a cover is chosen, and how the design is sought after and ultimately created. I would love to have an authors point of view and see just how the process is conducted and processes; maybe than would I begin to understand why authors/publishers choose the covers the way they do, and ultimately how mistakes like this book could be stopped/solved.

          If you have any books that share a similar ideology like this one, books that have covers that seemingly are gross, funny, or just downright distasteful to the book and the fans. I would like to see your books, and the covers that make you cower and scream in agony. While I am willing to admit that I to may scream and twitch in agony as well. Yet I will still watch and see the covers that are presented. :P

    [Featured Discussion] - Pet Peeves in Shopping

    This is a new segment, Featured Discussion. Where, I am looking at heading with this segment is more of a opinion based discussion. There is some that will be true and fact, but for the main part I want a good discussion, and I want people to chime in and talk. I will make my opinion and comments known as well. However please, PLEASE do not insult or degrade anyone else.

    Featured Discussion:

         So I thought I would be done gripping about Amazon and how they may have the sole power in determining the pricing of e-Books, but here I am again. This time it's a completely different topic, my Pet Peeves on Internet shopping and dealing with different marketplaces. I have a few different quips and peeves that bother me on internet shopping. It's a nice time to share those problems and a few gripes I have.



         Ravings on E-Shopping
         Recently I purchased two things from Amazon's Marketplace, now I know that Amazon isn't actually behind or in completely responsible for the people on the marketplace. However, the first one got canceled because apparently the person/company forgot they didn't have the item. I was disappointed, but I moved on.

         Next I ordered Shift by Em Bailey and the seller had listed it as a Used - Very Good and I reluctantly bought it because it was the best quality of book at the time. However, when I received the book the dust jacket was torn nearly in two, and book was nearly bent in half. The sides of the book had red markings all down the side.

          I looked around at other bloggers to see their point of view, and I found a blogger that struck me. I read the peeves 

    • When I put several items in my cart and shipping comes to 50 dollars. In turn I ask for combined shipping and they say I cant do that.. Well you lost a sale.
    • I have never seen so much junk for sale in my life. The real treasures are lost because no one can see them for all the stupid games people are playing.
    • Titles that do not say what the item is, they give the brand, and size but don’t tell what the item is.
    • No communication from the seller. It takes maybe 30 seconds to send a message that says thanks for the order, I’ll be shipping tomorrow (or whenever). Isn’t my business worth that 30 seconds?
    • Listings that are carry overs from other sites. Makes it confusing and crappy looking. If they can’t clean up a listing I hazard to guess how reliable they are.


         My biggest pet peeve at the moment is as a buyer when you are looking at different products reviewing just which one you should buy and shuffling through pages looking at product descriptions, and these sellers are listing stuff about their company and how great they are. Frankly I don't care how good of a company you are at the moment, I am looking at a product that you are Failing to describe and making me walk away now. That's the biggest turn off to a company I have; if in a product description I see anything about how a company is run, I RUN.

         Then I have to agree with the blog, comparing items on different sites I found that I was seeing the same product on Amazon that I was seeing on Barnes and Noble. Now how is that possible? Is there two items each listed once, or is there one items listed twice for "extra" publicity. Then what happens when that product is bought from both sites at the same time, which person gets the product? I dislike overlap and repetition, because more often than not there will be something that goes wrong.

         Furthermore, I hate the lack of responsibility of some of the sellers on the marketplaces. When reporting that your product is wrong or damaged they like to blame someone else. "Well it was listed as ______, and you must have misread it," "This was shipped correctly, and was damaged in shipment," and best of all "I am sorry, but my associate mislabeled the product. I apologize, but our transaction is complete." Just because you got my money, and I received a product doesn't make the transaction complete. I have found more pretentious, arrogant sellers than I have decent and honorable ones. I find that sad to say, and in fact makes it much much easier to buy from bigger corporations than local or smaller stores.

    [Featured Discussion] - E-Book Ruling & Amazon

    This is a new segment, Featured Discussion. Where, I am looking at heading with this segment is more of a opinion based discussion. There is some that will be true and fact, but for the main part I want a good discussion, and I want people to chime in and talk. I will make my opinion and comments known as well. However please, PLEASE do not insult or degrade anyone else.

    Featured Discussion:

         As many of you may know there is a large case that was going through the courts about Apple and some of the major book publishers around the world and how e-Books are priced. Now while I don't understand what exactly caused the whole solution, but I do know that Publishers were looking to raise the price of e-Books, because right now they have little to no power in the market. E-Books frankly should be cheaper and there's not much there to really worry about. If you buy e-Books this just sets it in stone for Amazon to be your personal store to go to.



         Barnes & Noble Back to it's Roots
         Short of colluding with one another or an outside vendor like Apple, publishers have almost no pricing power. Barnes & Noble ... is the last national bookseller standing and they've recently signaled a retreat from e-books back to their brick and mortar stores.

    Source: Yahoo! Finance

          I personally don't buy e-Books, unless I absolutely have to. They don't appeal to me and while I understand the concept and the purpose of e-Books there's just no enjoyment or overall pleasure of reading a book that an e-Device will give me. I lack the experience and the overall pleasure that a book gives me, and it pains me when I have to read a novella on my iPad.

          Now if you buy e-Books, the ruling in the case means that Amazon, having originally been an online book distributor, gives them nearly unlimited power of the market. Furthermore they're new Prime subscription will allow users to lend books and pass them between each other for lengths of time. So basically they are making a legal version of a peer2peer network, which everyone through a fit about a few years ago. I remember those days hearing about piracy and internet theft all over the place; my question is HOW is this different? One person buys the book, well back than what happened if one person bought a movie and decided to lend it out? Isn't that similar to how Amazon is setting themselves up? Or would there only be one token of that book (with my ID or something) on the file and I have to get it back before a second or third... person is able to borrow the book.

          Now I love the idea that one of the largest and last remaining physical bookstore is decided to wave the flag and go back to where they started and fill the niche for those who still enjoy carrying a physical book around. I think that's the smartest objective B&N could do, I can't stand Amazon at all. I have had my fair share of bad experiences with both providers, but I have had more bad experiences in a far far shorter time while I tried Amazon, and I won't go back to them at all.

          Furthermore, there are times when an e-Device just won't cut it. Look at Epic Reads' post for all the times in which reading a book would be better than just having some e-Device. I would have to add, no electricity; there is always that good storm we all have that inevitably take our power out, and than how do you read an e-Book? There are many many other situations in which having a book would be better than some e-Device. As well, just admit that in every one of those situations listed on Epic Reads that if you had an e-Device it wouldn't be that hard to steal it. I mean iPads and any e-Device isn't cheap.

    [Featured Discussion] - What Your Bookmarks Says About You

    This is a new segment, Featured Discussion. Where, I am looking at heading with this segment is more of a opinion based discussion. There is some that will be true and fact, but for the main part I want a good discussion, and I want people to chime in and talk. I will make my opinion and comments known as well. However please, PLEASE do not insult or degrade anyone else.

    Featured Discussion:

         I didn't have trouble picking this topic, because it comes from a blog, Barnes and Noble puts out and I found the topic interesting enough that I had to share it with those that read my blog. I never really gave it much thought to what a book mark said about me, I always viewed what a bookmark meant to mean, and how much I enjoyed the style/topic I chose. So to my surprise when I read this I opened my eyes a bit and loved the topic.

         So to not plagiarize, I will post the link, and give you all to the original post. I encourage you to make comments and comments there rather than here this week. While I greatly appreciate the feedback, they deserve the attention and input more so than I do. I will give my opinion on it afterward but there won't be much to say, if you wanted to talk about that, feel free to comment on that section. To put it simply, I don't want credit for their work, or their ideas and thus strongly urge to leave comments/views on their page.


         What Your Bookmarks Says About You
         A black ribbon. You frequently make eye contact with strangers through the spaces in library shelves, and have a tendency to come across mysterious photos in the pages of used books. When you pass a ringing pay phone (increasingly rare these days), you never fail to pick up.

         A sandwich shop punch card. You like to read while you eat, and who can blame you? You also like to read in the tub—hence the ripply bottoms of half the titles on your shelves.

         A puffy floral bookmark with a tassel. There’s someone in your life who loves you very much, but doesn’t know a whole lot about you. Whether it’s a parent, a grandma, or a very generous coworker, they’ve only managed to absorb the fact that your nose is always in a book. And so you receive blank journals and cushy bookmarks at the rate of about three per holiday.

         Branded bookstore bookmark. You bookstore tourist, you. Hawaii? Pass. You’d rather spend your vacation days in the chilly embrace of the Portland Powell’s. Morocco, Spain, the pyramids? More like the Strand, City Lights, and Shakespeare and Co. Who needs a Big Ben shot glass when you’ve got a bookmark from Foyles?

         A knife. Forget libraries: You tend to find your favorite books buried at a six-corner crossroads, wrapped in the hair of a virgin bride. You’re into genealogy, mainly because you can trace yours back to Lilith.

         Another, smaller book. You read everything, always. You read books in the street, shampoo bottles in the shower, and magazines at stoplights. When caught away from home without a book (the horror!), you read license plates, sales flyers, and the backs of other people’s newspapers out of desperation.

         A ripped-off piece of junk mail. You’re a democratic reader without a trace of snobbishness. Friend’s recommendation, stoop-sale giveaway, library’s new release table—who cares! If it’s words on a page, you’ll give it a try.

         Bookmark, schmookmark. A bent-back page is good enough for you! You like your books lived in—a little foxing never hurt anybody. You’re the bane of librarians everywhere, but you never say no to loaning out your favorites. Which is why you might as well go ahead and buy six copies of Cloud Atlas now. The good ones tend to get away.

          I never thought that bookmarks could actually say something about the person, but the more you look at it, the more you think about the types of people and their habits it begins to make sense. I would have to say I would fall into the category of A puffy floral bookmark with a tassel. Okay well it's not puffy or floral, I use a stainless steal bookmark from Sacchi, and I constantly look for more of their designs. It's more of a guys bookmark but I love that about Sacchi; they appeal to both women and men.

         So when I look at the description, that I would fall in I am amazed and feel it's somewhat true. I don't have someone I love that doesn't know it or me, I wish there were :P. I am single, as I have said over and over, and for me that's probably the main reason I dive into a book. There isn't anyone around here that has caught my eye, let alone has my attention and books are where my attention is drawn to. So that's the reason I was caught by surprise when I read this blog, and found it interesting enough that I wanted to share. If you get a chance, I would be curious to see what you use, and why you find this fun and interesting.

    [Featured Discussion] - Review Questions

    This is a new segment, Featured Discussion. Where, I am looking at heading with this segment is more of a opinion based discussion. There is some that will be true and fact, but for the main part I want a good discussion, and I want people to chime in and talk. I will make my opinion and comments known as well. However please, PLEASE do not insult or degrade anyone else.


    Featured Discussion:

         I have always been looking to try to improve my blog, improve the review process and overall give people a better understanding with just why I enjoyed a book I read. The issue was I was relying on my own knowledge and ability to convey that expression or idea across. This week I didn't have a good topic I wanted to discuss or talk about, so I went looking. In the first few pages I looked at it was about how to repair a page, and I realized that would be a great idea. The deeper I dug into that topic however, the more I realized this week I didn't have the time to put into something like that. It's a bit more than just slapping some tape onto a page.

         So back to the drawing board I went, I needed something that would help me improve, something that not only made me think but something I didn't expect to find. I did just that, shortly after the repair idea I found the topic for this week. Blog questions you should ask yourself when doing a review, and not just a normal one, a set of universal questions and questions for fiction and nonfiction alike. 


         Discussion Topics
    If you look closing you will see that this is mainly used for book clubs and other group type activities. However I turned this around and asked myself; "Why can't this be used for blogs or personal reviews as well, and not just groups? When reviewing a current book, I could ask the same or similar type of questions and get a better understand for why I enjoyed or disliked a book."

          This wasn't at all what I was hoping to find and wasn't really on my list to talk about, but the joys of Google and a blank mind. As well, this is something easy to discuss and talk about. Personally I don't ask myself anything when I review a book. I just start typing and plug every thought and feeling about the book down until I feel like I have done a good job. There are times where I go back and remove sentences, because it's just me rambling about nothing pretty much.

          So I guess this helps me and well surprises me as well; I could always use some structure and know where to start and just some question that would be good and great to answer in a book review. But what specific questions should I be asking? There are numerous lists of questions and topics to talk about, so frankly I want my questions to have some depth, and make me focus on specific areas and not just a vague or broad question. 

          On the link if you look there is a series of questions and I'm only going to highly a few that I think are worthwhile mentioning and more than likely I hope to use myself as well:

    Fiction Questions:
    1. What was unique about the setting of the book and how did it enhance or take away from the story?
    2. Do the characters seem real and believable? Can you relate to their predicaments? To what extent do they remind you of yourself or someone you know?
    3. In what ways do the events in the books reveal evidence of the author’s world view?
    4. Did certain parts of the book make you uncomfortable? If so, why did you feel that way? Did this lead to a new understanding or awareness of some aspect of your life you might not have thought about before?
    Universal Questions:
    1. Consider the main character: what does he or she believe in? What is he or she willing to fight for?
    2. What is stronger in the book: plot or character development? Why? Do you think this was intentional on the part of the author?
    3. Did you find this book a quick read? Why or why not?
    4. What are your concerns about this book?

         The reason I chose these four questions in both sections, even though they do go against what I was looking for, something to structure me and to focus me in a direction. They will structure me and focus me, but they are not laser specific into a X or Y topic. The questions give me room to talk, but still dancing around framework of the question which I enjoy. That allows me to get my opinion in as well as keep my blog credible and reliable.

         I am curious, when you review a book what's the questions you ask yourself about the book to provide a better structured review. I want to know what others use, and how they form a review that gives people a positive understanding of how you enjoyed/disliked the book and ultimately why you came up with that reason. It's a process that always evolves and we always ask ourselves different questions, I am curious on what universal and fiction questions come to mind people use and just why they feel those are important questions.

    [Featured Discussion] - What's With Genres?

    This is a new segment, Featured Discussion. Where, I am looking at heading with this segment is more of a opinion based discussion. There is some that will be true and fact, but for the main part I want a good discussion, and I want people to chime in and talk. I will make my opinion and comments known as well. However please, PLEASE do not insult or degrade anyone else.


    Featured Discussion:

         Last week I spoke about a common issue in everyone's mind, How OLD is too OLD? But in it I spoke directly to a specific style or genre of book, Young Adult. This week I wanted to segment into a different topic, What's so important about Genre's and Why do we really need them?


         Book Genres – A List Every Writer Should Know
    Since the publishing industry is segmented by genre, it is essential that you are able to identify and become intimately involved with your genre. As a first step along this road, here’s the genre list we use…

          Well when I first started doing research on Genres and why exactly they are so important in the book scene, I actually stumbled upon new information that I had never realized or would have thought about. On PublishingQuestions.com I find a great clarification on the term Genre and another classification term I hadn't thought of Category.

         Both are coined by, "A book genre or category is simply a distinction of one group of books from another by characteristics in form, style, or content that the books in that grouping have in common." (Source: Publishing Questions) Genre is mainly used to classify fiction while category is mainly used to classify nonfiction. Now, while that's all fine and dandy know the technical definitions of both, why are they used is a harder question to answer than it seems.

         By looking at BubbleCow, we know that genres categorize books into styles and content types and occasionally a new Genre will appear and thrive. New publishers will flock to that genre trying to fill shelf space and meet readers demands in this new area. So paying attention to genres and new emerging styles and types of Genres could you in a direction of a new favorite read, or a new topic to write about.

         Going over to my main source (Publishing Questions) though, I understand that if books weren't organized by a Genre or Category, it would simply be by he author's name. Just imagine how hard that would be to go into a Library and find a book that you are interested in and would read. The extensive knowledge you would need about the book before you even went into the bookstore/library would be mind boggling, and how would you find anything new?

         The issue however with Genre and Categories is there is no governing body who sets standards on which book should belong to which genre. Furthermore there isn't any real set standard on what a Thriller is. I am sure we all can identify a thriller, but can't books belong to multiple genres and categories? We put the books where they best fit, not based on any standards.

         Genres are important because they let a reader/customer walk into the library or bookstore and immediately know where they can find a specific book they are looking for, and the section of books that they enjoy reading. As well to writers, it allows them to see new emerging genres that publishers are looking to sign and help shelf a new empty empty bookcase. I look at Genres as a way to categorize or a characteristic of a book, that layers and layers the identity of a book making it unique and great all its own, because in the end I don't believe a book has just one particular genre.
     
    Support : Creating Website | Johny Template | Mas Template
    Copyright © 2011. The Paper Critic - All Rights Reserved
    Template Created by Creating Website Published by Mas Template
    Proudly powered by Blogger